Impact of Neck Dissection in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas of Unknown Primary - Institut Curie Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Cancers Année : 2021

Impact of Neck Dissection in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas of Unknown Primary

Idriss Troussier
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1100550
Arnaud Beddok
Valentin Calugaru
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1100553
Stephanie Servagi-Vernat
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1100554
Joël Castelli
Jessica Miroir
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1100555
Paul Giraud
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1100557
Edouard Romano
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1100558
Charles Dupin
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1100562
Vincent Roth
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1100565

Résumé

Simple Summary: A retrospective multicentric study of 322 patients with head and neck cancers of unknown primary (HNCUP) was performed testing the impact of neck dissection (ND) extent on nodal relapse, progression-free survival and survival. After 5 years, the incidence of nodal relapse was 13.4%, and progression-free survival (PFS) was 59.1%. In multivariate analysis after adjusting for nodal stage, the risk of nodal relapse or progression was reduced with lymphadenectomy, selective ND or radical/modified ND but survival rates were similar. Patients undergoing lymphadenectomy or ND had significantly better PFS and a lower nodal relapse incidence in the N1 + N2a group, but the improvement was not significant for the N2b or N2 + N3c patients. Severe toxicity rates exceeded 40% with radical ND. In HNCUP, ND improves PFS regardless of nodal stage but fails to improve survival. The magnitude of the benefit of ND did not appear to depend on ND extent and decreased with a more advanced nodal stage. Abstract: Purpose: Management of head and neck cancers of unknown primary (HNCUP) combines neck dissection (ND) and radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy. The prognostic value of ND has hardly been studied in HNCUP. Methods: A retrospective multicentric study assessed the impact of ND extent (adenectomy, selective ND, radical/radical-modified ND) on nodal relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) or survival, taking into account nodal stage. Results: 53 patients (16.5%) had no ND, 33 (10.2%) had lymphadenectomy, 116 (36.0%) underwent selective ND and 120 underwent radical/radical-modified ND (37.3%), 15 of which received radical ND (4.7%). With a 34-month median follow-up, the 3-year incidence of nodal relapse was 12.5% and progression-free survival (PFS) 69.1%. In multivariate analysis after adjusting for nodal stage, the risk of nodal relapse or progression was reduced with lymphadenectomy, selective or radical/modified ND, but survival rates were similar. Patients undergoing lymphadenectomy or ND had a better PFS and lowered nodal relapse incidence in the N1 + N2a group, but the improvement was not significant for the N2b or N2 + N3c patients. Severe toxicity rates exceeded 40% with radical ND. Conclusion: In HNCUP, ND improves PFS, regardless of nodal stage. The magnitude of the benefit of ND does not appear to depend on ND extent and decreases with a more advanced nodal stage
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
cancers-13-02416-v2.pdf (1.25 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Publication financée par une institution

Dates et versions

hal-03244833 , version 1 (01-06-2021)

Identifiants

Citer

Yazan Abu-Shama, Julia Salleron, Florent Carsuzaa, Xu-Shan Sun, Carole Pflumio, et al.. Impact of Neck Dissection in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas of Unknown Primary. Cancers, 2021, 13 (10), pp.2416. ⟨10.3390/cancers13102416⟩. ⟨hal-03244833⟩
138 Consultations
77 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More